Table 1.
WT | OE1 | OE2 | OE3 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Effective panicles per plant | 9.914 ± 1.729 | 10.925 ± 1.280∗ | 10.401 ± 2.060∗ | 10.617 ± 1.505∗ |
Biomass per plant (g) | 241.26 ± 16.968 | 297.45 ± 25.560∗ | 290. 695 ± 20.028∗ | 287.45 ± 24.219∗ |
Filled grain number per plant | 1524.629 ± 109.651 | 2034.508 ± 115.914∗ | 2080.125 ± 138.489∗ | 2051.845 ± 169.470∗ |
Grain weight per plant (g) | 26.799 ± 4.382 | 31.213 ± 3.934∗ | 32.478 ± 3.585∗ | 31.034 ± 3.354∗ |
Actual yield increased over WT (%) | 5.5 | 6.7 | 6.1 |
For the field yield trials, the planting density was 19.98 cm × 19.98 cm and the number of rice plants was 100 for each OE line and WT ZH11. The data were analyzed using Duncan’s tests, ∗represents significant difference comparing to WT ZH11 (P < 0.05).