Table III.
Case | Age | Sharp angle | CE angle | ARO angle | MJSW | DDH | Surgical plan |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
yrs | rt/lt (°) | rt/lt (°) | rt/lt (°) | rt/lt (mm) | rt/lt | ||
Case 4 | 59 | 50.0 / 49.8 | 14.1/15.2 | 28.5/23.4 | 2.4/3.5 | + | PO / PO |
Case 7 | 51 | 49.1 / 45.1 | 8.7/19.1 | 30.1/15.2 | 1.9/4.5 | – | PO / – |
Case 20 | 22 | 53.1 / 51.6 | 6.2/14.9 | 31.0/20.9 | 3.9/4.8 | – | PO / PO |
Case 25 | 47 | 60.3 / 56.2 | -14.4/8.5 | 45.4/31.1 | 0/0 | + | THA / THA |
Case 37 | 26 | 51.1 / 50.4 | 0/5.5 | 24.6/22.5 | 0/3.2 | – | THA / PO |
Case 39* | 67 | 52.6 / 55.3 | –/– | 30.5/31.3 | –/– | + | THA / THA |
Case 55 | 69 | 51.7 / 51.2 | -19.5/-7.4 | 40.7/37.5 | 0/3.0 | + | THA / PO |
Case 59 | 45 | 52.3 / 55.4 | -5.4/-16.9 | 35.7/36.9 | 4.5/3.7 | + | PO / PO |
Case 61 | 42 | 56.3 / 52.7 | 3.5/9.5 | 29.6/22.2 | 3.7/3.5 | + | PO / PO |
Case 39 had a bilaterally high congenital dislocation of the hip
CE, centre edge; ARO, acetabular roof obliquity; MJSW, minimum joint space width; DDH, developmental dysplasia of the hip; rt, right side; lt, left side; PO, pelvic osteotomy; THA, total hip arthroplasty