Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 2;6(7):405–413. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.67.BJR-2017-0017.R2

Table I.

Patient and surgical factors for all non-metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties revised for adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD), and in hips not undergoing re-revision surgery compared with those undergoing re-revision surgery

Covariate All ARMD hip revisions (n = 185) (100%) ARMD hip revisions not undergoing re-revision surgery (n = 160) (86.5%) ARMD hip revisions undergoing re-revision surgery (n = 25) (13.5%) p-value
Female 119 (64.3) 101 (63.1) 18 (72.0) 0.389
Age at revision (yrs), mean (sd) 66.4 (10.6) 67.0 (10.8) 62.8 (9.0) 0.046
BMI (kg/m2)*, mean (sd) 28.2 (5.0) 28.1 (4.9) 29.3 (6.5) 0.589
Time from primary to revision (yrs), mean (sd) 3.1 (2.6) 3.2 (2.7) 2.8 (2.0) 0.363
Yr revision performed
2008 to 2011 56 (30.3) 45 (28.1) 11 (44.0) 0.108
2012 to 2014 129 (69.7) 115 (71.9) 14 (56.0)
ASA grade at revision
1 33 (17.8) 30 (18.8) 0.234
2 128 (69.2) 107 (66.9) 21 (84.0)
3 24 (13.0) 23 (14.4)
VTE – chemical
LMWH (+/-other) 114 (61.6) 98 (61.3) 16 (64.0) 0.270
Aspirin only 10 (5.4) 9 (5.6)
Other 52 (28.1) 47 (29.4)
None 9 (4.9) 6 (3.8)
VTE – mechanical (any versus none) 180 (97.3) 155 (96.9) 25 (100) 1.00
Revision surgeon grade (consultant versus other) 176 (95.1) 152 (95.0) 24 (96.0) 1.00
Surgical approach (posterior versus other) 127 (68.7) 108 (67.5) 19 (76.0) 0.394
Revision indications/intra-operative findings
ARMD (+/-pain) only 82 (44.3) 74 (46.3) 8 (32.0) 0.182
Additional indications 103 (55.7) 86 (53.8) 17 (68.0)
ARMD 185 (100) § § §
Pain 41 (22.2) § § §
Aseptic loosening (any) 45 (24.3) § § §
Acetabular 27 (14.6)
Femoral 23 (12.4)
Osteolysis (any) 21 (11.4) § § §
Acetabular 13 (7.0)
Femoral 13 (7.0)
Other abnormal findings § § §
Implant malalignment 18 (9.7) § § §
Acetabular liner wear 23 (12.4) § § §
Fracture 9 (4.9) § § §
Dislocation/subluxation 17 (9.2) § § §
Infection § § §
Incorrect implant size § § §
Liner dissociation 8 (4.3) § § §
Implant fracture 9 (4.9) § § §
Revision procedure
Selective component 134 (72.4) 111 (69.4) 23 (92.0) 0.017
All component 51 (27.6) 49 (30.6)
Revision femoral head size (mm)*
Mean (sd) 33.1 (3.7) 33.1 (3.6) 33.1 (4.3) 0.969
Range 22.25 to 40 22.25 to 40 22.25 to 40
28 42 (23.5) 37 (23.7) 0.975
32 52 (29.1) 45 (28.9) 7 (30.4)
36 85 (47.5) 74 (47.4) 11 (47.8)
Revision bearing* (n, %)
MoP 87 (51.5) 81 (54.7) 6 (28.6) 0.072
CoC 45 (26.6) 37 (25.0) 8 (38.1)
CoP 37 (21.9) 30 (20.3) 7 (33.3)
Revision component fixation
Uncemented 90 (81.8) 81 (81.8) 9 (81.8) 1.00
Cemented 20 (18.2) 18 (18.2)
Revision stem fixation
Uncemented 43 (51.2) 39 (50.0) 0.676
Cemented 41 (48.8) 39 (50.0)
Bone graft (femoral) 7 (3.8) 7 (4.4) 0 (0) 0.596
Bone graft (acetabular) 27 (14.6) 22 (13.8) 0.375
*

missing data for stated number of hips: BMI (n = 72); revision femoral head size (n = 6); revision bearing surface (n = 16)

selective component revision procedures included cases where at least one component from the primary arthroplasty procedure was retained at revision. This included either the femoral or acetabular component being retained at revision, or both the femoral and acetabular components being retained, with revision of the femoral head and liner (with or without the use of a taper adapter)

data suppressed due to small count within the cell. The actual number was between one and five

§

due to small numbers, statistical comparisons between hips re-revised and hips not re-revised have not been performed for the individual revision indications

ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists; BMI, body mass index; CoC, ceramic-on-ceramic; CoP, ceramic-on-polyethylene; LMWH, low-molecular weight heparin; MoP, metal-on-polyethylene; VTE, venous thromboembolism

All values in the table are number, with the percentages in brackets, unless otherwise indicated

Statistically significant differences between the re-revised and non re-revised hips (p < 0.05) are highlighted in bold text