Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 2;6(7):405–413. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.67.BJR-2017-0017.R2

Table III.

Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis to identify predictors of re-revision surgery following revision surgery performed for adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD)

Covariate Univariable hazard ratio (95% CI) p-value Multivariable hazard ratio (95% CI) p-value
Gender (female versus male) 1.41 (0.59 to 3.37) 0.443 * *
Age at revision (per yr) 0.97 (0.94 to 1.00) 0.072 0.97 (0.93 to 1.01) 0.165
BMI (per kg/m2) 1.04 (0.93 to 1.17) 0.464 * *
Time from primary to revision (per yr) 0.96 (0.82 to 1.13) 0.659 * *
ASA grade at revision
1 1.00 Ref * *
2 1.95 (0.58 to 6.54) 0.280
⩾ 3 0.46 (0.05 to 4.44) 0.504
VTE – chemical
None 1.00 Ref 1.00 Ref
LMWH (+/-other) 0.47 (0.14 to 1.60) 0.227 0.26 (0.07 to 1.02) 0.053
Aspirin only 0.28 (0.03 to 2.70) 0.271 0.35 (0.03 to 3.65) 0.378
Other 0.31 (0.07 to 1.31) 0.111 0.21 (0.04 to 1.05) 0.057
VTE – mechanical (any versus none) * *
Revision surgeon grade (consultant versus other) 1.23 (0.17 to 9.06) 0.842 * *
Surgical approach (posterior versus other) 1.48 (0.59 to 3.70) 0.407 * *
Revision indications
ARMD (+/-pain) only 1.00 Ref 1.00 Ref
Additional indications 1.76 (0.76 to 4.09) 0.186 2.78 (1.03 to 7.49) 0.043
Revision procedure
All components revised 1.00 Ref 1.00 Ref
Selective component revision 5.01 (1.18 to 21.3) 0.029 5.76 (1.28 to 25.9) 0.022
Revision femoral head size (in mm)
⩽ 28 1.00 Ref * *
32 1.09 (0.35 to 3.44) 0.882
⩾ 36 1.11 (0.39 to 3.20) 0.845
Revision bearing
MoP 1.00 Ref 1.00 Ref
CoC 2.84 (0.98 to 8.18) 0.054 1.79 (0.54 to 5.89) 0.339
CoP 2.96 (1.00 to 8.83) 0.051 3.08 (1.01 to 9.36) 0.047
Revision cup fixation
Uncemented 1.00 Ref * *
Cemented 0.99 (0.21 to 4.60) 0.993
Revision stem fixation
Uncemented 1.00 Ref * *
Cemented 0.51 (0.09 to 2.80) 0.440
Bone graft (femoral) * *
Bone graft (acetabular) 1.31 (0.49 to 3.50) 0.590 * *
*

covariate was not eligible for inclusion in the final multivariable model

unable to calculate value as no hips in this subgroup underwent re-revision surgery

selective component revision procedures included cases where at least one component from the primary arthroplasty procedure was retained at revision. This included either the femoral or acetabular component being retained at revision, or both the femoral and acetabular components being retained, with revision of the femoral head and liner (with or without the use of a taper adapter)

ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists; BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; CoC, ceramic-on-ceramic; CoP, ceramic-on-polyethylene; LMWH, low-molecular weight heparin; Ref, reference group; MoP, metal-on-polyethylene; VTE, venous thromboembolism

Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) have been highlighted in bold text

Due to missing BMI data, the univariable analysis for BMI was based on a cohort of 113 hip revisions with ten hips undergoing re-revision surgery

Multivariable analysis was based on a cohort of 167 hip revisions with 21 hips undergoing re-revision surgery