Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 1;7:7028. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07376-5

Table 1.

Micro CT analysis at 10 weeks after DMM surgery.

Parameter WT DMM (n = 8) WT Sham (n = 8) Hyal2 −/− DMM (n = 8) Hyal2 −/− Sham (n = 8) WT relative change (%) Hyal2 −/− relative change (%)
Sb BV/TV (%) 57.2 ± 8.6* 44.1 ± 7.5 52.0 ± 5.5† 32.7 ± 10.2‡ 25.1 ± 4.0 59.9 ± 14.0§
Sb Th (μm) 60.4 ± 3.1* 52.5 ± 3.5 51.3 ± 5.7†¶ 42.9 ± 7.4‡ 12.8 ± 7.0 24.1 ± 8.7
Tb BV/TV (%) 41.1 ± 4.2 43.7 ± 2.7 30.5 ± 5.8¶ 31.3 ± 7.6‡ −5.5 ± 7.0 −2.3 ± 2.6
Tb Th (μm) 58.2 ± 2.7 61.0 ± 6.6 50.1 ± 6.5¶ 52.0 ± 3.6‡ −3.8 ± 4.6 −4.9 ± 3.6
Tb Sp (μm) 101.6 ± 18.0* 85.2 ± 5.4 119.9 ± 14.0†¶ 99.3 ± 12.7‡ 19.3 ± 11.2 17.9 ± 4.0
Tb.N (/mm) 7.1 ± 0.8 7.9 ± 0.6 6.1 ± 1.0¶ 6.8 ± 1.6‡ −9.8 ± 8.2 −11.1 ± 6.4

Relative increase of parameters was calculated as follows [(value of DMM – value of Sham) ÷ value of sham × 100%]

*Statistically significant difference between Wild DMM and Wild Sham.

†Statistically significant difference between Hyal2 −/− DMM and Hyal2 −/− Sham.

‡Statistically significant difference between Hyal2 −/− Sham and Wild Sham.

§Statistically significant difference between relative increase Hyal2 −/− and Wild.

¶Statistically significant difference between Hyal2 −/− DMM and Wild DMM.