Skip to main content
. 2017 May 12;18(4):51–61. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12090

Table 3.

Comparison of gradient nonlinearity distortion statistics generated for 1.0 T Panorama to determine agreement between two approaches

Established MATLAB/Phantom data (method 1) Experimental 3D Slicer/modular phantom data (method 2)
L‐R A‐P S‐I L‐R A‐P S‐I
Max distortion (mm) 5.5 4.2 6.1 8.2 6.5 8.7
Voxels distorted > 1 mm (%) 39.3 26.1 25.2 45.6 22.8 45.1
Voxels distorted > 2 mm (%) 14.8 3.2 5 20.0 5.9 12.8
Voxels distorted > 3 mm (%) 4.4 0.4 1.2 7.8 2.2 3.1
Voxels distorted > 4 mm (%) 0.5 <0.1 0.3 2.7 0.8 1.0
Voxels distorted > 5 mm (%) <0.1 0 <0.1 0.7 0.2 0.3
Mean absolute error (mm) 0.3 ± 0.4 0.2 ± 0.2 0.5 ± 0.6 0.3 ± 0.4 0.3 ± 0.3 0.6 ± 0.6