Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 18;19(7):e219. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7421

Table 1.

Baseline patient and family caregiver characteristics by treatment arm.

Characteristics Intervention arm (n=21) Control arm (n=21)
Patients

Age in years, mean (SD) 60 (12.8) 59.5 (13.8)

Female sex, n (%) 13 (61.9) 16 (76.2)

Primary cancer site, n (%)


Breast 1 (4.8) 10 (47.6)


Colorectal 2 (9.5) 1 (4.8)


Lung 3 (14.3) 6 (28.6)


Prostate 2 (9.5) 0


Ovarian 0 1 (4.8)


Thyroid 2 (9.5) 0


Lymphoma 6 (28.6) 0


Melanoma 0 1 (4.8)


Brain 1 (4.8) 0


Other 4 (19.0) 2 (9.5)

Annual household income in CDN$, n (%)


$0-$21,999 2 (9.5) 4 (19.1)


$22,000-$49,999 2 (9.5) 2 (9.5)


$50,000-$89,999 7 (33.3) 4 (19.1)


>$90,000 4 (19.1) 5 (20.8)


Prefer not to disclose 6 (28.6) 6 (28.6)

Primary language, n (%)


English 20 (95.2) 20 (95.2)


Other 1 (4.8) 1 (4.8)

Age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index, mean (SD)a 5.2 (2.5) 5.8 (1.9)

Caregiver, n (%)


Yes 4 (19.1) 6 (28.6)


No 17 (81.0) 15 (71.4)

Highest education attained, n (%)


Primary school


High school 4 (19.1) 6 (28.6)


College/University 8 (38.1) 8 (38.1)


Professional/Graduate degree 9 (42.9) 7 (33.3)

ECOG score, median (interquartile range)b 1.5 (1-2) 1 (1-2)

Outcome measures (n=39)


POS, mean (SD)c 9.3 (6.8) 9.8 (5.4)


Picker Continuity and Coordination subscale, mean (SD)d 47.9 (28.5) 62.5 (25.3)


ESAS (Total Symptom Distress Score), mean (SD)e 21.2 (17.1) 23.4 (12.9)
Family caregivers of consented patient participants (n=18) (n=8)

Age in years, mean (SD) 57 (15.9) 54 (14.6)

Female sex, n (%) 9 (60.0) 6 (33.3)

Missing, n (%) 3 (16.7)

Relationship to patient, n (%)



Spouse 7 (38.9) 4 (22.2)


Immediate family 5 (27.8) 8 (44.4)


Other 3 (16.7)

Missing data 3 (16.7)

aAge-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index is a measure of comorbidity based on risk of mortality. The score is weighted by age, increasing for each decade over age 40 [44].

bECOG scale is scored from 1-5 with 1 being well and 4 indicating complete disability. A value of 5 indicates death.

cMean summed scores are presented for POS with a maximum score of 40. Higher scores indicate worse quality of care.

dThe Picker Continuity and Coordination subscale is a proportion of total number of positive responses to total number of responses. Higher scores indicate the higher perceived continuity of care.

eMean summed scores are presented for the ESAS with a maximum score of 90. Higher scores indicate higher symptom distress.