Skip to main content
. 2017 May 17;118(2):932–948. doi: 10.1152/jn.00119.2017

Table 1.

Characteristic frequency misalignment direction in ipsilateral AI and contralateral AI, referenced to injured right ear

Ipsilateral AI CF Misalignment
Contralateral AI CF Misalignment
Frequency Band Monkey Up Down None N Monkey Up Down None N
<0.5 kHz
SM06 0 0 0 0 SM15 0 0 0 0
SM09 0 0 0 0 SM23 0 0 0 0
0.5–1 kHz
SM06 0 0 2 2 SM15 1 6 3 10
SM09 1 0 11 12 SM23 0 7 8 15
1–2 kHz
SM06 11 0 11 22 SM15 1 2 18 21
SM09 16 2 31 49 SM23 3 12 20 35
2–4 kHz
SM06 23 1 43 67 SM15 2 4 18 24
SM09 7 4 30 41 SM23 4 3 11 18
4–8 kHz
SM06 0 0 22 22 SM15 1 1 15 17
SM09 1 0 16 17 SM23 1 0 5 6
>8 kHz
SM06 1 0 0 1 SM15 0 0 0 0
SM09 0 0 0 0 SM23 0 0 0 0
All bands
Total 60 7 166 233 13 35 98 146
Percentage 25.8 3.0 71.2 100 8.9 24.0 67.1 100

In both cortices at week 24, the majority of characteristic frequency (CF) misalignment sites are found in frequency bands between 1 and 4 kHz. CF difference = log[(CF contralateral ear stimulation)/CF ipsilateral ear stimulation)]/log(2). Up criterion: CF difference > 0.63. Down criterion: CF difference < −0.27. Ipsilateral AI (up: 25.8%, down: 3.0%) differs from contralateral AI (up: 8.9%, down: 24.0%) most notably in the dominant direction of CF misalignment (P < 0.01, χ2-test). N, count.