Table 1.
Pedro | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ajimsha et al.19 | + | + | − | − | + | − | + | + | − | + | + | 6/10 |
Cleland et al.21 | + | + | + | + | − | − | + | + | + | + | + | 8/10 |
Dimou et al.20 | + | + | − | + | − | − | + | + | + | + | − | 6/10 |
Kuhar et al.16 | + | + | − | + | − | − | − | − | − | + | + | 4/10 |
Renan-Ordine et al.18 | + | + | − | + | − | − | + | − | − | + | + | 5/10 |
Saban et al.22 | + | + | + | + | − | − | + | − | + | + | + | 7/10 |
Wynne et al.15 | + | + | − | − | + | − | − | − | − | + | − | 3/10 |
Yadav and Lakshmiprabha17 | + | − | − | + | − | − | − | − | − | + | + | 3/10 |
Notes: + = Criterion was satisfied; − = Criterion was not satisfied.
1 = Eligibility criteria specified.
2 = Subjects were randomly allocated in groups.
3 = Allocation was concealed.
4 = Groups were similar at baseline.
5 = Subjects were blinded.
6 = Therapists who administered the treatment were blinded.
7 = Assessors were blinded.
8 = Measures of key outcomes were obtained from more than 85% of subjects.
9 = Data were analysed by intention-to-treat.
10 = Statistical comparisons between groups were conducted.
11 = Point measures and measures of variability were provided.