Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 8;17(7):1598. doi: 10.3390/s17071598

Table 1.

Comparisons of the proposed and the previously researched methods.

Category Methods Advantage Disadvantage
Single camera-based AdaBoost cascade [17]
  • -

    Faster processing speeds.

  • -

    Better performance under low image resolutions.

  • -

    Affected by various environmental changes, such as, changing lighting and shadows, and cases where the background temperature is similar to that of the pedestrians’ body.

HOG–SVM [18,22], integral HOG [19], neural network based on receptive fields [20], and background generation [21]
  • -

    More resilient in simple conditions.

  • -

    Faster processing speed than multiple camera-based algorithm.

CNN-based method [6,10] More accurate than the past single camera-based method.
Multiple camera-based Stereo visible light cameras Shape and texture information [23] Better detect pedestrians as it is able to utilize more information than the single camera-based method.
  • -

    Longer time to process as it has to process both the camera images.

Visible light & NIR cameras HOG-SVM [22]
Visible light & FIR cameras Tetra-vision-based HOG-SVM [24] Better night vision pedestrian detection inside the car.
  • -

    No performance without vehicle headlight.

  • -

    High number of calculation is required as it needs to process two camera images.

Camera selection [11] Better performance under various conditions.
  • -

    Detection capability is affected as it has no final verification process for the detected pedestrian area.

Difference image-based fusion [12]
Late fusion CNN-based method [13] Higher CNN-based detection accuracy.
  • -

    Processing hours and algorithm complexity increases as the method processes input from two camera images to conduct CNN twice.

Proposed method
  • -

    Increased detection reliability (compared to the single camera-based method) by means of adaptively selecting one candidate between two pedestrian candidates received from visible light and FIR camera images. Applies a FIS, and reduces algorithm complexity and processing time.

  • -

    More resilient detection capability under various environmental changes by means of intensively training and using a diverse dataset.

Design of the fuzzy rule tables and membership function is needed for the FIS.