. 2017 Jul 8;17(7):1598. doi: 10.3390/s17071598

Table 8.

Comparisons of classification accuracies with original DVLFPD-DB1 based on confusion matrix (unit: %).

Method			Recognized		Avg. of TPR and TNR
Method			Pedestrian	Non-Pedestrian	Avg. of TPR and TNR
Actual	HOG-SVM based [18,22]	Pedestrian	97.86	2.14	96.28
	HOG-SVM based [18,22]	Non-pedestrian	5.31	94.69	96.28
	CNN and single visible light camera-based [6]	Pedestrian	97.69	2.31	97.59
	CNN and single visible light camera-based [6]	Non-pedestrian	2.52	97.48	97.59
	CNN and single FIR camera-based [10]	Pedestrian	96.53	3.47	96.95
	CNN and single FIR camera-based [10]	Non-pedestrian	2.64	97.36	96.95
	Late fusion CNN-based [13]	Pedestrian	98.38	1.62	98.03
	Late fusion CNN-based [13]	Non-pedestrian	2.33	97.67	98.03
	Proposed method	Pedestrian	99.63	0.37	99.61
	Proposed method	Non-pedestrian	0.41	99.59	99.61