. 2017 Jul 8;17(7):1598. doi: 10.3390/s17071598

Table 10.

Comparisons of classification accuracies with degraded DVLFPD-DB1 based on confusion matrix (unit: %).

Method			Recognized		Avg. of TPR and TNR
Method			Pedestrian	Non-Pedestrian	Avg. of TPR and TNR
Actual	HOG-SVM based [18,22]	Pedestrian	96.11	3.89	92.13
	HOG-SVM based [18,22]	Non-pedestrian	11.85	88.15	92.13
	CNN and single visible light camera-based [6]	Pedestrian	97.32	2.68	89.16
	CNN and single visible light camera-based [6]	Non-pedestrian	19.01	80.99	89.16
	CNN and single FIR camera-based [10]	Pedestrian	96.62	3.38	95.33
	CNN and single FIR camera-based [10]	Non-pedestrian	5.97	94.03	95.33
	Late fusion CNN-based [13]	Pedestrian	95.96	4.04	93.01
	Late fusion CNN-based [13]	Non-pedestrian	9.94	90.06	93.01
	Proposed method	Pedestrian	96.33	3.67	97.23
	Proposed method	Non-pedestrian	1.88	98.12	97.23