Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 8;17(7):1598. doi: 10.3390/s17071598

Table 12.

Comparisons of classification accuracies with OSU color-thermal database based on the confusion matrix (unit: %).

Method Recognized Avg. of TPR and TNR
Pedestrian Non-Pedestrian
Actual HOG-SVM based [18,22] Pedestrian 99.11 0.89 98.69
Non-pedestrian 1.73 98.27
CNN and single visible light camera-based [6] Pedestrian 99.64 0.36 98.75
Non-pedestrian 2.14 97.86
CNN and single FIR camera-based [10] Pedestrian 99.51 0.49 98.54
Non-pedestrian 2.44 97.56
Late fusion CNN-based [13] Pedestrian 99.28 0.72 98.90
Non-pedestrian 1.49 98.51
Proposed method Pedestrian 99.58 0.42 99.02
Non-pedestrian 1.54 98.46