Skip to main content
. 2005 Feb 15;5:3. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-5-3

Table 3.

Socioeconomic details of patient sample

Factors (n = 191) No. (% of sample) No. (%) using herbs
Residential district
Rural 27 (14.1) 6/27 (22.2)
Suburban 119 (62.3)* 36/119 (30.3)
Urban 42 (22.0) 15/42 (35.7)
No response 3 (1.6) 1/3 (33.3)

Highest educational level attained
No formal education 10 (5.2) 2/10 (20.0)
≤ 7 years of formal education 101 (52.9) 26/101 (25.7)
≤ 12 years of formal education 64 (33.5) 20/64 (31.3)
> 12 year of formal education 16 (8.4) 10/16 (62.5)*

Employment status
Unemployed 58 (30.4) 19/58 (32.8)
Technical 12 (6.3) 6/12 (50.0)
Professional 16 (8.4) 5/16 (31.3)
Clerical 13 (6.3) 6/13 (46.2)
Vocational 28 (12.6) 5/28 (17.9)
Student 8 (4.2) 4/8 (50.0)
Housewife 23 (12.0) 7/23 (30.4)
Pensioner 33 (17.3) 6/33 (18.2)

Annual income (US$)
≤ 3,999 82 (42.9) 22/82 (26.8)
4000 – 9,999 73 (38.2) 23/73 (31.5)
10,000 – 11,999 12 (6.3) 4/12 (33.3)
12,000 – 19,999 15 (7.9) 7/15 (46.7)
≥ 20,000 9 (4.7) 2/9 (22.2)