Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2017 Jun 19;29:125–134. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2017.06.003

Table 4.

Intervention Acceptability

Total
(N=30)
Colorectal
(N=15)
Lung
(N=15)
Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD)
How helpful was the SM-SCP for the following:
(Range=0–4; 0=not helpful at all, 4=very helpful)
Contact Information for your doctors 3.33 (1.02) 3.07 (1.22) 3.60 (.74)
Information about the types of treatments that you received 3.50 (.82) 3.33 (.90) 3.67 (.72)
When to see your cancer doctor for follow-up and what types of scans/blood work you need 3.50 (.90) 3.13 (1.13) 3.87 (.35)
Information on how to manage possible late/long-term effects from treatments 3.28 (1.16) 2.80 (1.37) 3.79 (.58)
Information about how to stay physically active and eat a better diet 2.77 (1.43) 2.47 (1.41) 3.07 (1.44)
Information about screening for other cancers 2.83 (1.34) 2.33 (1.29) 3.33 (1.23)
Information about resources that you can use on the internet or through telephone 2.60 (1.45) 2.47 (1.13) 2.73 (1.75)
When to see your cancer doctor for follow-up and what types of scans/blood work you need 3.62 (.86) 3.50 (1.09) 3.73 (.59)
Possible late/long-term effects from treatments 3.30 (1.06) 3.13 (1.06) 3.47 (1.06)
How to stay physically active and eat a better diet 3.37 (1.16) 3.07 (1.22) 3.67 (1.05)
Screening for other cancers 3.17 (1.07) 2.93 (1.03) 3.43 (1.09)
How user-friendly was the format of TS/CP? (Range=0–4; 0=not user-friendly at all, 4=very user-friendly) 3.43 (.69) 3.40 (.63) 3.47 (.74)
*Was the amount of information in the TS/CP: 2.10 (.48) 2.07 (.59) 2.13 (.35)
*Was the time spent going over the care plan: 2.00 (.46) 1.93 (.46) 2.07 (.46)
*

1=too little; 2=the right amount; 3=too much