Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 1;49:60. doi: 10.1186/s12711-017-0336-z

Table 2.

Relative contribution to the proportion of DRP variance explained by variants in different MAF classes for 17 traits

Traits and scenarios Relative contribution of MAF classes to the explained DRP variance Total proportion of DRP variance explained
0.001–0.01 0.01–0.05 0.05–0.5
YIELD 0.063 0.038 0.899 0.860
MILK 0.015 0.030 0.955 0.872
PROT 0.054 0.038 0.908 0.858
FAT 0.022 0.012 0.966 0.854
MILKORG 0.072 0.003 0.925 0.679
MILKSP 0.005 0.035 0.960 0.719
LONG 0.081 0.141 0.778 0.630
MASTI 0.019 0.000 0.981 0.669
HEALTH 0.125 0.121 0.755 0.514
LEG 0.059 0.149 0.796 0.525
CALV 0.037 0.000 0.963 0.507
BIRTH 0.000 0.020 0.980 0.602
FERT 0.000 0.133 0.867 0.600
BODY 0.088 0.026 0.886 0.568
GROWTH 0.010 0.087 0.903 0.814
TEMP 0.054 0.059 0.887 0.406
NTM 0.031 0.030 0.940 0.847

All the variants were partitioned into seven MAF classes. In this table, we report the proportion of DRP variance explained for three groups of MAF classes (rare: MAF < 0.01, low-frequency: 0.01 ≤ MAF < 0.05 and common: MAF ≥ 0.05). For the group of common variants, the proportion of DRP variance explained was equal to the sum of the proportions of DRP variance explained for classes of variants with MAF: 0.05–0.1; 0.1–0.2; 0.2–0.3; 0.3–0.4 and 0.4–0.5