Table A1.
The average AUC achieved by different feature representations
Method | One‐layer random forest | Proposed hierarchical classification |
---|---|---|
Intensity features | 0.698 | 0.743 |
Haar‐like features | 0.811 | 0.826 |
LBP features | 0.742 | 0.763 |
HOG features | 0.753 | 0.784 |
Proposed high‐level features | 0.805 | 0.817 |