Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Protoc. 2017 Jan 12;12(2):255–278. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2016.169

TABLE 3.

Server performance based on the last three CAPRI evaluation meetingsa

CAPRI evaluation meeting year and number of targets
2009, 12 Targets 2013, 14 Targets 2016, 14 Targets
Rank Server Success Server Success Server Success
1 ClusPro14
(Vajda/Kozakov)		 5/1***/3** ClusPro15
(Vajda/Kozakov)		 6/4** ClusPro15
(Vajda/Kozakov)		 9/3**
2 HADDOCK69
(Bonvin)		 4/1***/1** HADDOCK69
(Bonvin)		 4/1***/1** DOCK/PIERR120
(Elber)		 6/2**
3 GRAMM-X78,
(Vakser)		 2/2** SWARMDOCK74
(Bates)		 4/1** LzerD122
(Kihara)		 4/1***/3**
4 SKE-DOCK123
(Umeyama)		 2/1** DOCK/PIERR120
(Elber)		 3/1** HADDOCK69
(Bonvin)		 4/2**
a

Number of targets with acceptable or better quality predictions / number of targets with highly accurate (***) predictions / number of target with medium accuracy (**) predictions.