Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 2.
Published in final edited form as: J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;45(4):1109–1117. doi: 10.3233/JAD-142628

Table 2.

Estimated mean number of microbleeds based on main analysis and several sensitivity analyses looking at how three atypical AD subjects with a large number of microbleeds affect the results.

Total Frontal Temporal Parietal Occipital
DAT 1.0 (0.4, 2.4) 0.1 (0.0, 0.4) 0.2 (0.1, 0.4) 0.3 (0.1, 0.7) 0.2 (0.1, 0.7)
Atypical AD
 All subjects 8.0 (3.9, 17)*** 4.5 (1.7, 12)*** 1.2 (0.5, 3.0)** 1.4 (0.6, 3.5)* 0.5 (0.2, 1.5)
 Omitting three outliers 1.5 (0.8, 2.9) 0.7 (0.2, 1.8)* 0.3 (0.1, 0.8) 0.3 (0.1, 0.6) 0.1 (0.0, 0.3)
 Omitting two outliers 3.1 (1.6, 6.1)* 1.5 (0.5, 5.1)** 0.5 (0.2, 1.4) 0.6 (0.2, 1.6) 0.2 (0.1, 0.5)
 Giving outliers the highest value among non-outliers 2.7 (1.5, 5.0)* 1.3 (0.6, 2.8)** 0.5 (0.3, 1.1) 0.4 (0.2, 0.8) 0.2 (0.1, 0.4)
*

P < 0.05;

**

P < 0.01;

***

P <0.001 versus Dementia of the Alzheimer’s Type (DAT)