Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 2;12(8):e0180891. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180891

Table 2. Frequency and distribution of salivary flow classification and perception of xerostomia/dry mouth.

Variable Women N(%) Men N(%) p Insulin N(%) Non-insulin N(%) p
Salivary flow classification
Normal 4 (4.9) 5 (13.2) 0.381 5 (8.3) 4 (6.7) 0.177
Mild Hyposalivation 2 (2.4) 2 (5.3) 3 (5.0) 1 (1.7)
Moderate Hyposalivation 19 (23.2) 8 (21.1) 8 (13.3) 19 (31.7)
Severe Hyposalivation 52 (63.4) 23 (60.4) 41 (68.4) 34 (56.7)
Asialia 5 (6.1) 0 (0) 3 (5.0) 2 (3.2)
Perception of xerostomia/dry mouth according to VAS
None/mild 41 (50.0) 20 (52.6) 0.947 33 (55.0) 28 (46.7) 0.561
Moderate 37 (45.1) 16 (42.1) 25 (41,7) 28 (46.7)
Severe 04 (4.9) 02 (5.3) 02 (3.3) 04 (6.6)

Source: research data. Fisher’s Exact test