Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 1;9:58. doi: 10.1186/s13195-017-0284-4

Table 2.

Description of the anticholinergic exposure according to the different scores, and according to the diagnostic stage

Exposure to anticholinergic, frequency (%)
Mean ± SD Total (n = 473) Major NCD (n = 219) Mild NCD (n = 131) SCD (n = 123) p value for difference between diagnostic stage*
ACB 0.78 ± 1.24 188 (39.75%) 98 (44.75%) 47 (35.88%) 43 (34.96%) 0.12
ADS 0.67 ± 0.93 208 (43.97%) 108 (49.32%) 56 (42.75%) 44 (35.77%) 0.05
ARS 0.26 ± 0.67 81 (17.12%) 41 (18.72%) 22 (16.79%) 18 (14.63%) 0.63
Chew’s score 1.09 ± 1.39 235 (49.68%) 118 (53.88%) 58 (44.27%) 59 (25.11%) 0.20
Han’s score 0.57 ± 0.89 168 (35.52%) 93 (42.47%) 39 (29.77%) 36 (29.27%) 0.01

*Unadjusted association

Association between Han’s score and diagnostic stage remained significant (p = 0.03) after adjustment for age (p = 0.12), gender (p = 0.92), total number of drugs (p ≤ 0.001), and Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) (p = 0.06). Pairwise test showed significant difference between major NCD and mild NCD, and SCD (p = 0.01), and no difference between mild NCD and SCD (p = 0.93)

ACB Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden, ADS Anticholinergic Drug Scale, ARS Anticholinergic Risk Scale, NCD neurocognitive disorder, SCD subjective cognitive decline