Table 1.
Empirical evaluation of our top four interactive network visualization tools (Cytoscape, Gephi, Tulip, and Pajek) for large-scale biological network analysis.
| Cytoscape | Tulip | Gephi | Pajek | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scalability | ∗∗ | ∗ | ∗∗∗ | ∗∗∗∗ |
| User friendliness | ∗∗ | ∗∗∗∗ | ∗∗∗ | ∗ |
| Visual styles | ∗∗∗∗ | ∗∗ | ∗∗∗ | ∗ |
| Edge bundling | ∗∗∗ | ∗∗∗∗ | ∗∗ | — |
| Relevance to biology | ∗∗∗∗ | ∗∗ | ∗∗∗ | ∗ |
| Memory efficiency | ∗ | ∗∗ | ∗∗∗ | ∗∗∗∗ |
| Clustering | ∗∗∗∗ | ∗∗∗ | ∗ | ∗∗ |
| Manual node/edge editing | ∗∗∗ | ∗∗∗∗ | ∗∗∗ | ∗ |
| Layouts | ∗∗∗ | ∗∗ | ∗∗∗∗ | ∗ |
| Network profiling | ∗∗∗∗ | ∗∗ | ∗∗∗ | ∗ |
| File formats | ∗∗ | ∗∗∗ | ∗∗∗∗ | ∗ |
| Plugins | ∗∗∗∗ | ∗∗ | ∗∗∗ | ∗ |
| Stability | ∗∗∗ | ∗ | ∗∗∗∗ | ∗∗∗ |
| Speed | ∗∗ | ∗ | ∗∗∗ | ∗∗∗∗ |
| Documentation | ∗∗∗∗ | ∗ | ∗∗ | ∗∗∗ |
∗ = weaker; ∗∗ = medium; ∗∗∗ = good; ∗∗∗∗ = strongest.