Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 18;2017:1278932. doi: 10.1155/2017/1278932

Table 1.

Empirical evaluation of our top four interactive network visualization tools (Cytoscape, Gephi, Tulip, and Pajek) for large-scale biological network analysis.

  Cytoscape Tulip Gephi Pajek
Scalability ∗∗ ∗ ∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗
User friendliness ∗∗ ∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗ ∗
Visual styles ∗∗∗∗ ∗∗ ∗∗∗ ∗
Edge bundling ∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗ ∗∗ —
Relevance to biology ∗∗∗∗ ∗∗ ∗∗∗ ∗
Memory efficiency ∗ ∗∗ ∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗
Clustering ∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗ ∗ ∗∗
Manual node/edge editing ∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗ ∗
Layouts ∗∗∗ ∗∗ ∗∗∗∗ ∗
Network profiling ∗∗∗∗ ∗∗ ∗∗∗ ∗
File formats ∗∗ ∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗ ∗
Plugins ∗∗∗∗ ∗∗ ∗∗∗ ∗
Stability ∗∗∗ ∗ ∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗
Speed ∗∗ ∗ ∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗
Documentation ∗∗∗∗ ∗ ∗∗ ∗∗∗

∗ = weaker; ∗∗ = medium; ∗∗∗ = good; ∗∗∗∗ = strongest.