Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 1;28(5):e62. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e62

Table 3. Univariate and multivariate analyses for OS rate using Cox regression model.

Variables Subsets No. Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
HR 95% CI p-value HR 95% CI p-value
FIGO stage I–II 13 3.64 0.91–14.61 0.068 - - -
III–IV 9
Carcinoma grade G1–2 4 31.78 0.46–22,008.54 0.300 - - -
G3 18
Sarcomatous component Homologous 13 2.05 0.55–7.64 0.288 - - -
Heterologous 8
Tumor size (cm) <7 10 2.14 0.53–8.67 0.285 - - -
≥7 12
Myometrial invasion ≤1/2 13 1.52 0.41–5.78 0.518 - - -
>1/2 9
LVSI Absence 12 0.78 0.21–2.95 0.719 - - -
Presence 10
Ascites Negative 15 3.28 0.81–13.28 0.097 - - -
Positive 6
LN metastasis Absence 16 6.38 1.38–29.48 0.018* 3.761 0.79–17.91 0.096
Presence 4
MRI unenhanced region (%) <10 9 8.29 1.03–67.11 0.047* 5.381 0.60–47.95 0.312
≥10 13

CI, confidence interval; FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; HR, hazard ratio; LN, lymph node; LVSI, lymphovascular space invasion; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; OS, overall survival.

*p<0.050.