Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 20;7(6):e013823. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013823

Table 3.

Association of ZIP code, county and participant characteristics with recent homelessness among people who inject drugs from 19 US metro areas in 2009

Univariate model
OR (95% CI)
Multivariable model
adjusted OR (95% CI)*
Intercept 19.58 (1.13 to 339.80)
Region
  Northeast (reference) 1.00
  South 1.19 (0.73 to 1.93)
  Midwest 0.71 (0.33 to 1.55)
  West 1.33 (0.77 to 2.28)
Metropolitan statistical area (n=19)
Random intercept variance 0.06 (0 to 2.61) 0.06 (0 to 2.00)
County (n=51)
Random intercept variance 0.26 (0.10 to 0.70) 0.21 (0.07 to 0.69)
Percent unaffordable rental units among low-income households 0.97 (0.94 to 1.01) 0.99 (0.96 to 1.02)
Average number of months that applicants were on waiting lists for assisted housing 1.00 (0.98 to 1.01)
ZIP code (n=937)
Random intercept variance 0.31 (0.23 to 0.43) 0.17 (0.11 to 0.26)
Economic deprivation 0.98 (0.95 to 1.02)
Gentrification 1.13 (1.07 to 1.18) 1.11 (1.04 to 1.17)
Participant
characteristics
Current age 0.97 (0.96 to 0.97) 0.98 (0.97 to 0.98)
Sex (1=male) 0.88 (0.80 to 0.98) 0.81 (0.73 to 0.91)
Race/ethnicity
 White (reference) 1.00 1.00
 Black 0.66 (0.58 to 0.75) 0.76 (0.66 to 0.87)
 Latino 0.87 (0.75 to 1.01) 0.83 (0.71 to 0.97)
Annual income (US$5000 vs more) 0.48 (0.44 to 0.53) 0.48 (0.44 to 0.53)
Full-time employment 0.34 (0.27 to 0.42) 0.38 (0.30 to 0.49)
Incarceration 2.19 (1.98 to 2.42) 1.84 (1.65 to 2.05)
Daily injection (vs less than daily) 1.23 (1.10 to 1.37) 1.18 (1.04 to 1.32)
Binge drinking 1.51 (1.38 to 1.66) 1.30 (1.18 to 1.44)
Non-injection drug use 1.41 (1.27 to 1.57) 1.23 (1.10 to 1.37)
Type of sexual partner in the past 12 months
 None 1.00 1.00
 Main 1.15 (0.82 to 1.60) 1.14 (0.81 to 1.60)
 Casual 2.10 (1.91 to 2.31) 1.76 (1.60 to 1.95)
Recent self-reported HIV test result
 Indeterminate result/or did not receive result
 (reference)
1.00 1.00
 Negative result 0.78 (0.69 to 0.88) 0.86 (0.76 to 0.99)
 Positive result 0.49 (0.39 to 0.62) 0.63 (0.50 to 0.80)

*The multivariable model assessed the relationships of place-based factors significant at p<0.20 in univariate models to homelessness, controlling for individual-level confounders.