Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 3.
Published in final edited form as: J Chem Theory Comput. 2017 May 17;13(6):2418–2429. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00059

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Representative ensemble of the non-native K63 aMD model using the full 14-member scattering basis (A,B) and the best two-state model (C-G). (A) Populations of the individual states of the 14-member model, where error bars indicate the standard deviation of each marginal posterior distribution. Individual goodness-of-fit values are denoted above the corresponding population bar. (B) Comparison of the ensemble averaged scattering profile (red) against the experimental data (black). (C) Relative populations of the best two-state combination with individual χfree2 values above the plot. (D) Individual scattering profiles of each state. (E) Ensemble-averaged scattering of the two-state model compared with experimental data. (F) Representative member of the compacted cluster. (G) Representative member of the extended cluster.