Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 2;19:58. doi: 10.1186/s12968-017-0377-z

Table 2.

Comparison of measured to synthetic Hct and ECV for each regression fit

Mean ± SD Range
Measured Hct (%) 41.8 ± 3.4 (32, 56)
Synthetic Hctpublished (%) 44.0 ± 3.7 (37.6, 59.1)
Synthetic Hctlocal (%) 41.8 ± 1.4 (39.5, 57.3)
Measured ECV Mid-septum (%) 29.5 ± 3.9 (20.8, 46.2)
Synthetic ECVpublished Mid-septum (%) 28.4 ± 3.7 (20.6, 45.7)
Synthetic ECVlocal Mid-septum (%) 29.5 ± 3.6 (21.2, 46.2)
Synthetic ECVstatic Mid-septum (%) 27.9 ± 3.5 (19.9, 43.1)
Measured ECV Mid-free wall (%) 30.5 ± 4.8 (20.1, 45.9)
Synthetic ECVpublished Mid-free wall (%) 29.3 ± 4.7 (20.2, 42.5)
Synthetic ECVlocal Mid-free wall (%) 29.7 ± 4.6 (19.6, 41.7)
Synthetic ECVstatic Mid-free wall (%) 28.8 ± 4.4 (17.8, 41.4)