Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 7;28(14):1924–1936. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E16-12-0875

FIGURE 5:

FIGURE 5:

Effect of blocking WRAMP structures on cell speed and wound healing. To measure cell speed, (A) WM239a and (B) A375 cells were transfected with PB-H2B-mCherry and seeded on glass-bottom 96-well plates, followed by scratch wounding. Every cell that migrated into the wound was tracked using a cell-tracking algorithm, calculating movement speed for individual cells. Bars show the mean and SEM from three wells (>360 cells/condition for WM239a cells and >180 cells/condition for A375 cells). *p < 0.01 and **p < 0.005. The p values were calculated using standard two-tailed Student’s t test. (C–F) Scratch wound assays were used to measure of the effects of suppressing Wnt5a signaling and MCAM expression on wound healing. Cells were imaged using bright-field microscopy in plastic 96-well dishes, and four wells were measured for each condition at various time points. We quantified (C) WM239a and (D) A375 cells in the presence of 10% FBS and (E) WM239a and (F) A375 cells in the absence of serum. Two-way analysis of variance was used to determine the significance between the treatments and nontargeting siRNA control across the time points. Treatment is significantly different compared with nontargeting control (NTC) siRNA with p < 0.0001.