Table 1. Clinical Characteristics and Genetic Background of Participants by Study Group.
G+/LVH+(n=81) | G+/LVH-(n=55) | Control (n=42) | 3- Group P-Value | G+/LVH+ vs G+/LVH-P-value | G+/LVH+ vs Control P-value | G+/LVH- vs Control P-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age at baseline, yrs | 26.9 (14) | 20.4 (10) | 17.5 (8) | < 0.001 | 0.003 | <0.0001 | 0.12 |
Female, n (%) | 28 (35%) | 30 (55%) | 24 (57%) | 0.019 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.80 |
Race, n (%) | 0.122 | 0.11 | 0.42 | 0.08 | |||
White | 75 (93%) | 55 (100%) | 39 (93%) | ||||
Black or African American | 5 (6%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (2%) | ||||
Asian | 1 (1%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (2%) | ||||
More than one race | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (2%) | ||||
Body Surface Area (kg/m2) | 1.83 (0.41) | 1.69 (0.32) | 1.61 (0.40) | 0.006 | 0.02 | 0.005 | 0.33 |
Height, cm | 168.5 (17.8) | 162.2 (14.4) | 159.6 (18.0) | 0.012 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.42 |
Weight, kg | 72.3 (24.1) | 63.2 (18.3) | 59.5 (22.5) | 0.005 | 0.01 | 0.005 | 0.38 |
Systolic blood pressure, mmHg | 115 (15) | 113 (12) | 113 (13) | 0.724 | 0.50 | 0.54 | 0.99 |
Diastolic blood pressure, mmHg | 68 (9) | 68 (9) | 66 (10) | 0.510 | 0.80 | 0.34 | 0.28 |
NYHA Class, n(%) | |||||||
Class I | 67 (83%) | 55 (100%) | 42 (100%) | ||||
Class II | 10 (12%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | ||||
Class III | 2 (2%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | ||||
Class IV | 2 (2%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | ||||
Medication Use, n (%) | |||||||
Amiodarone | 3 (4%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | ||||
β-blockers | 28 (35%) | 1 (2%) | 0 (0%) | ||||
Calcium channel blockers | 9 (11%) | 1 (2%) | 0 (0%) | ||||
Disopyramide | 1 (1%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | ||||
Coumadin/warfarin | 3 (4%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | ||||
No medications | 32 (40%) | 34 (62%) | 32 (76%) | ||||
| |||||||
Genetic Background, n (%) | |||||||
MYH7 | 26 (32%)a | 22 (40%) | |||||
MYBPC3 | 44 (54%)b | 29 (53%)e | |||||
TNNT2 | 7 (9%)c | 1 (2%) | |||||
TNNI3 | 1 (1%) | 0 | |||||
MYL2 | 1 (1%) | 0 | |||||
MYL3 | 2 (3%)d | 2 (3%) | |||||
ACTC | 0 | 1 (2%) |
Values are reported as mean (SD) or n (%)
P values <0.017 are considered statistically significant, applying post hoc Bonferroni correction.
One patient also had a secondary MYH7 mutation
One patient also had a TNNI3 mutation and one had a secondary MYBPC3 mutation
One patient also had a secondary MYBPC3 mutation
Both patients also had a secondary MYBPC3 mutation
One patient also had a secondary MYBPC3 mutation