Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Retina. 2016 Dec;36(Suppl 1):S26–S39. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001330

Table 4.

Comparison of microstructure in neovascular AMD and geographic atrophy eyes

# Metric Neovascular
AMD (N=27)
Geographic
atrophy*
(N=13)
P
1 % of RPE phenotypes ≥ ’very non-uniform’ in non-atrophic area
  −500 µm 97.7% 72.2% 0.002
7
  −100 µm 100.0% 96.8% n.s.
2 RPE phenotypes in
atrophic area
‘dissociated’,
‘subducted’,
‘melanotic’ **,
‘entombed’ **,
‘entubulated’
‘dissociated’,
‘subducted’,
‘entubulated’
--
3 BLamD thickness,
non-atrophic area
3.25 ± 3.46 µm 7.99 ± 7.49 µm 0.017
4 BLamD thickness,
atrophic area
3.70 ± 4.81 µm 6.63 ± 6.17 µm 0.047
5 Shape of ELM descent
  Oblique 47.9% 31.9% 0.046
  Curved +

  reflected
52.1% 68.1%

Notes:

*

30;

**

29;

53

±500, ±100, distances from ELM descent in µm, negative is non-atrophic, positive is atrophic;

Statistical evaluation: n.s., not significantat p< 0.05 level.

Line 3–4 thicknesses in given locations were pooled across all RPE phenotypes.