Skip to main content
. 2017 May 16;8(28):46337–46347. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.17940

Table 3. Multivariate analysis for PFS and OS in pooled study population treated with FOLFIRINOX and FDR-GEM plus CAP.

PFS Univariate analysis, HR (95% CI) P Multivariate analysis, HR (95% CI) P
RegimenFOLFIRINOX vs.FDR-GEM plus CAP 0.41 (0.16–1.00) 0.04 0.27 (0.09–0.81) 0.02
Age≥60 vs. <60 years 0.92 (0.39–2.15) 0.84 0.29 (0.10–0.86) 0.03
Baseline CA 19-9≥UNL vs. <UNL 4.83 (0.65–36.01) 0.13 19.8 (1.92–203.84) 0.01
SexFemale vs. male 1.13 (0.48–2.63) 0.78 2.60 (0.95–7.11) 0.06
SurgeryYes vs. no 0.10 (0.03–0.31) <0.001 0.05 (0.01–0.21) <0.001
OS Univariate analysis, HR (95% CI) P Multivariate analysis, HR (95% CI) P
RegimenFOLFIRINOX vs.FDR-GEM plus CAP 0.56 (0.25–1.29) 0.12
Age≥60 vs. <60 years 1.17 (0.54–2.53) 0.70
Baseline CA 19-9≥UNL vs. <UNL 1.58 (0.59–4.25) 0.37 3.20 (1.11–9.19) 0.03
SexFemale vs. male 0.76 (0.34–1.71) 0.51
SurgeryYes vs. no 0.22 (0.10–0.52) <0.001 0.15 (0.06–0.37) <0.001

PFS: progression-free survival; OS: overall survival; HR: hazard ratio; CI: confidence interval; FDR, fixed-dose rate; GEM, gemcitabine; CAP, capecitabine; UNL: upper normal limit.