Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 28;8(28):46436–46448. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.17502

Table 2. Univariate metaregression analysis of possible sources of heterogeneity across studies.

Possible source of heterogeneity Adjusted-R2 (%)a Pb
No. of patients 0.3 0.301
Ethnicity (Asian or not) 61.78 0.033
Study design (multi- or single-center cohort) 87.86 0.042
Age −9.30 0.310
Age < 18 y (%) −28.77 0.627
Follow-up time (months) 14.74 0.152
Male/female −10.84 0.465
Hypertension (%) −14.07 0.281
Immunosuppressive therapy (%) −35.70 0.926
Treatment with RASBs (%) −36.04 0.682
End point eventc number −2.84 0.351

aProportion of between-study variance explained by covariates.

bP value derived from the joint test for all covariates with Knapp–Hartung modification.

cEnd-stage kidney disease (ESRD), >50% decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), or doubling of serum creatinine concentration.