Table 2.
I | CI complexity is embedded in institutional learning perspectives | ||
A | There are many types of organizational elements in the curriculum that are connected in varied, complex ways | ||
1 | Curriculum designer | ||
B | Organ systems integration | ||
1 | Official curriculum | ||
2 | Observations | ||
C | Humanities-clinical sciences integration | ||
1 | Official curriculum | ||
D | Spiral integration | ||
1 | Official curriculum | ||
2 | Observations | ||
E | Cases are successfully used when students read them, brainstorm, derive knowledge, and report on each case in a one week cycle | ||
1 | Curriculum designer | ||
2 | Observations | ||
II | CI is used to harmonize conflicting learning perspectives in curriculum practice | ||
F | Experience-topics integration in cases | ||
1 | Curriculum designer | ||
2 | Facilitator | ||
G | Disciplinary knowledge has an important influence in the learning outcomes of the official curriculum | ||
1 | Official curriculum | ||
2 | Curriculum designer | ||
H | There are some tensions in the curriculum related to the university’s learning perspectives and the broad topics in medicine | ||
1 | Observation | ||
2 | Student | ||
III | CI creates tensions that self-organize its structure | ||
I | Tension between students’ expectations and the official documents of the study program | ||
1 | Facilitator | ||
2 | Observation field notes | ||
J | Students adjust their learning activities when they struggle with the sessions | ||
1 | Student | ||
IV | CI becomes visible in collaborative learning spaces | ||
K | Case close sessions enable students to discuss and explain their learning outcomes | ||
1 | Facilitator | ||
2 | Student | ||
L | Drawing on the blackboard is an activity that supports learning | ||
1 | Observation field notes | ||
2 | Student |
aThe table shows some of the themes from which constructs emerged, and these themes were chosen arbitrarily from the theme lists to better represent the inductive analysis