Table 5.
Effect of different types of surface treatment on ceramill (amanngirrbach) group between the surface treated group and the control group
| GROUP | n | Mean | P VALUE£ |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| 1 | 8 | 902.3625 | <0.001** |
| 2 | 8 | 1408.1500 | |
| 1 | 8 | 902.3625 | |
| 3 | 8 | 1264.7875 | <0.001** |
| 1 | 8 | 902.3625 | |
| 4 | 8 | 1320.8500 | <0.001** |
| 1 | 8 | 902.3625 | |
| 5 | 8 | 1160.0125 | <0.005* |
| 1 | 8 | 902.3625 | <0.001** |
| 6 | 8 | 1242.4625 | |
| 1 | 8 | 902.3625 | |
| 7 | 8 | 1295.3750 | <0.001** |
| 1 | 8 | 902.3625 | 0.001** |
| 8 | 8 | 1476.7250 | |
| 1 | 8 | 902.3625 | |
| 9 | 8 | 1258.3000 | <0.001** |
| 1 | 8 | 902.3625 | <0.001** |
| 10 | 8 | 1341.8250 | |
£
Using t test;
*
P value ≤ 0.05 stastistically significant;
**
P value ≤ 0.001 highly statistically significant.