Table 1.
Comparison of the analytical performance for proposed method with other reported chemically modified electrochemical detection of CA.
| Electrode | Linear range (µM) | LOD (µM) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|
| PG/GCE | 9–40 | 3.9 | 49 |
| Plant-peroxidase-chitin/CPE | 20–200 | 2 | 50 |
| Glassy polymeric carbon | 0.9–11 | 0.2 | 5 |
| PbFE | 0.01–0.5 | 0.004 | 51 |
| AuNPs -chitosan/GE | 0.05–2000 | 0.025 | 52 |
| AuNP/GN/GCE | 0.05–50 | 0.05 | 53 |
| Nafion/ER-GO/GCE | 0.01–1.5 | 0.09 | 54 |
| MIS/GE | 0.5–60 | 0.15 | 55 |
| LDHf/GCE | 7–180 | 2.6 | 56 |
| PGE | 0.01–3000 | 0.08 | 57 |
| MWNTs-[BuPy]PF6-CS/GCE | 0.02–7 | 0.005 | 58 |
| Laccase biosensor (LTV-SPE) | 0.5–1300 | 0.52 | 59 |
| Laccase-MWCNT-chitosan/Au | 0.7–10 | 0.15 | 60 |
| Tyrosinase/diazonium/SPGE | 0.3–83 | 0.2 | 61 |
| LuPc2 nanowires/ITO | 60–5000 | 3.12 | 62 |
| Nafion/Tyre/Sonogel-Carbon | 0.08–2 | 0.06 | 63 |
| Glassy polymeric carbon | 96.5–0.1 | 0.29 | 64 |
| Glassy carbon electrode | 10–120 | 0.1 | 65 |
| Rod-like SrV2O6/GCE | 0.01–207 | 0.004 | This work |
Abbreviation: PG-Poly(glutamic acid; GCE-glassy carbon electrode; CPE-carbon paste electrode; PbFE-lead film electrode; AuNPs-colloidal gold nanoparticles; GE-gold electrode; GN-graphene Nanosheets; ER-GO-electrochemically reduced graphene oxide; MIS-molecularly imprinted siloxanes; LDHf-layered double hydroxide film; PGE-pencil graphite electrode; MWCNT- Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes; [BuPy]PF6-Butylpyridinium Hexafluorophosphate; CS- Chitosan; LTV- Laccase (Trametes versicolor); SPE- Screen printed electrode; Au- Gold sheets electrode; SPGE- Screen printed gold electrode; LuPc2-Lutrium bisphthalocyanine; ITO- Indium tin oxie.