Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 13;165(2):343–353. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4328-z

Table 2.

Efficacy analysis on the basis of local and central assessment

ITT [n = 27] Per protocol [n = 23]
Local assessment
Clinical benefit rate 18.5% (6.3–38.1%) 21.7% (7.4–43.7%)
Response at 6 month scan
 Complete response 0 0
 Partial response 0 0
 Stable disease 5 5
 Progressive disease 16 16
 Dead 1 1
 Withdrawal 5 1
Central assessment
Clinical benefit rate 14.8% (4.2–33.7%) 17.4% (5.0–38.8%)
Response at 6 month scan
 Complete response 0 0
 Partial response 0 0
 Stable disease 4 4
 Progressive disease 15 15
 Dead 1 1
 Withdrawala 7 3

ITT intent to treat; Prior to 3 month scan: three patients decided to withdraw; one patient withdrawn by local investigator. These four patients had no scan and were excluded in the per-protocol analysis; Between 3 and 6 month scan: one patient withdrawn

aAt month 3: two patients PD reclassified as SD by central review and thus treated as withdrawals