Table 2.
Efficacy analysis on the basis of local and central assessment
ITT [n = 27] | Per protocol [n = 23] | |
---|---|---|
Local assessment | ||
Clinical benefit rate | 18.5% (6.3–38.1%) | 21.7% (7.4–43.7%) |
Response at 6 month scan | ||
Complete response | 0 | 0 |
Partial response | 0 | 0 |
Stable disease | 5 | 5 |
Progressive disease | 16 | 16 |
Dead | 1 | 1 |
Withdrawal | 5 | 1 |
Central assessment | ||
Clinical benefit rate | 14.8% (4.2–33.7%) | 17.4% (5.0–38.8%) |
Response at 6 month scan | ||
Complete response | 0 | 0 |
Partial response | 0 | 0 |
Stable disease | 4 | 4 |
Progressive disease | 15 | 15 |
Dead | 1 | 1 |
Withdrawala | 7 | 3 |
ITT intent to treat; Prior to 3 month scan: three patients decided to withdraw; one patient withdrawn by local investigator. These four patients had no scan and were excluded in the per-protocol analysis; Between 3 and 6 month scan: one patient withdrawn
aAt month 3: two patients PD reclassified as SD by central review and thus treated as withdrawals