Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 3;177(7):1038–1040. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.1917

Table 1. Characteristics of Voting Members at All Meetingsa With at Least 1 Section 502 Conflict, 2008-2014.

Characteristic Members With Conflicts, No. (%) P Value
Section 502 Only
(n = 187)
Section 208 Only
(n = 12)
Both
(n = 14)
Neither
(n = 1269)
Committee member status .73b
Standing 75 (40.1) 3 (25.0) 5 (35.7) 513 (40.4)
Temporary 112 (59.9) 9 (75.0) 9 (64.3) 756 (59.6)
Participant’s role in the affected organization .56c
Principal investigator 39 (20.9) 3 (25.0) NA NA
Officerd 69 (36.9) 4 (33.3) NA NA
Consultant-speaker 44 (23.5) 1 (8.3) NA NA
Employee 14 (7.5) 1 (8.3) NA NA
Others 21 (11.2) 0 NA NA
Stakeholders 0 3 (25.0) NA NA
Source of conflict <.001c
Sponsor 167 (89.3) 5 (41.7) NA NA
Competitor 16 (8.6) 7 (58.3) NA NA
Both 4 (2.1) 0 NA NA
Nature of conflict .53c
Imputede 114 (61.0) 8 (66.7) NA NA
Personal 55 (29.4) 4 (33.3) NA NA
Both 18 (9.6) 0 NA NA

Abbreviation: NA, not applicable.

a

Includes product and nonproduct meetings at the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research and the Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Individual advisory committee members may have attended more than one meeting. The 502 conflicts are identified only if no section 208 conflict exists for a particular meeting. Individuals may have waivers for both conflicts if they are issued for different particular matters.

b

Pearson χ2 test, comparing all 4 categories.

c

Pearson χ2 test, comparing only section 502 conflict with only section 208 conflict.

d

A person elected or appointed to manage the organization’s daily operations, such as a president, vice president, secretary, treasurer, or board chair.

e

Conflicts assigned to an advisory committee member based on their personal relationships or employment (eg, a research contract with a potential members’ employer in which the member has no involvement).