Table 1.
Fur animal imports by the study farms
| Country of origina | Denmark | Poland | Norway | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FENP | Yes (%) | No (%) | Pb | Yes (%) | No (%) | Pb | Yes (%) | No (%) | Pb | |||||||
| 2009 | + | 9 (24) | 29 (76) | 0.001 | 0 (0) | 38 (100) | 1.000 | 1 (3) | 37 (97) | 1.000 | ||||||
| – | 7 (5) | 141 (95) | 1 (1) | 147 (99) | 7 (5) | 141 (95) | ||||||||||
| 2010 | + | 12 (18) | 56 (82) | 0.011 | 5 (7) | 63 (93) | 0.536 | 3 (4) | 65 (96) | 0.396 | ||||||
| – | 8 (6) | 130 (94) | 7 (5) | 131 (95) | 11 (8) | 127 (92) | ||||||||||
| 2011 | + | 5 (7) | 62 (93) | 0.044 | 9 (13) | 58 (87) | 0.001 | 3 (4) | 64 (96) | 0.394 | ||||||
| – | 2 (2) | 130 (98) | 2 (2) | 130 (98) | 12 (9) | 120 (91) | ||||||||||
Fur animal imports from Denmark, Poland and Norway during the period from 2009 through 2011 for FENP-positive (+) and FENP-negative (−) farms
aIn 2010 and 2011 combined imports of the year in question and the previous year because of the unknown incubation time of FENP
bFisher’s exact test P value