Table 4.
Treatment k | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rank b | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
AL | AQSP | ASAQ | ASAQCPH | ASATPG | ASCD | ASMQ | ASNAPH | ASPY | ASSMP | ASSP | DHAP | DHAPT | |
1 | 0 | 0.004 | 0 | 0.11 | 0.53 | 0 | 0.01 | 0.11 | 0.037 | 0.006 | 0.005 | 0.065 | 0.10 |
2 | 0 | 0.02 | 0.15 | 0.16 | 6 × 10−5 | 0.03 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.023 | 0.026 | 0.25 | 0.14 | |
3 | 10−5 | 0.06 | 0.001 | 0.10 | 0.07 | 3 × 10−4 | 0.069 | 0.054 | 0.10 | 0.004 | 0.068 | 0.31 | 0.09 |
4 | 8 × 10−4 | 0.11 | 0.008 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 9 × 10−4 | 0.10 | 0.04 | 0.11 | 0.06 | 0.12 | 0.22 | 0.0076 |
5 | 0.004 | 0.15 | 0.03 | 0.07 | 0.036 | 0.002 | 0.12 | 0.04 | 0.11 | 0.086 | 0.16 | 0.095 | 0.068 |
6 | 0.02 | 0.166 | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.004 | 0.13 | 0.036 | 0.098 | 0.097 | 0.17 | 0.03 | 0.058 |
7 | 0.06 | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.054 | 0.021 | 0.007 | 0.12 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.14 | 0.009 | 0.05 |
8 | 0.14 | 0.11 | 0.22 | 0.04 | 0.016 | 0.010 | 0.098 | 0.028 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.109 | 0.002 | 0.04 |
9 | 0.23 | 0.08 | 0.22 | 0.04 | 0.014 | 0.016 | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.096 | 0.07 | 3 × 10−4 | 0.04 |
10 | 0.27 | 0.06 | 0.16 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 4 × 10−4 | 0.053 |
11 | 0.19 | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.13 | 0.03 | 10−6 | 0.08 |
12 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.08 | 0.01 | 0.33 | 0.05 | 0.12 | 0.058 | 0.10 | 0.01 | 10−6 | 0.1 |
13 | 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.001 | 0.053 | 0.007 | 0.48 | 0.01 | 0.30 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.001 | 0 | 0.076 |
Results from model 2 are shown
Lines of the table are rank probabilities denoted from 1 (best) to 13 (worst). In each line, rank probability (rank b, b = 1,…, 13) is given for each treatment, with ASATPG (0.53), followed by ASNAPH (0.11) and ASAQCPH (0.11). At lines 2 and 3, DHAP has the highest rank probability. At line 13, the highest probability 0.48 was obtained with ASCD