Table III. Comparative GWAS results for plant height estimated using different extraction algorithms.
SNP |
Auto-PHe |
UsIn-PHe |
Manuala |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
−log10 (P) | R2 | Rankb | −log10 (P) | R2 | Rankb | −log10 (P) | R2 | Rankb | |
S9_57236791 | 18.673 | 0.301 | 1 | 18.072 | 0.290 | 1 | 17.903 | 0.292 | 2 |
S9_57236778 | 17.634 | 0.283 | 2 | 17.257 | 0.276 | 2 | 18.421 | 0.290 | 1 |
S6_42736415 | 9.795 | 0.153 | 4 | 10.189 | 0.162 | 1 | 10.742 | 0.180 | 2 |
S6_44959724 | 10.427 | 0.155 | 1 | 9.701 | 0.145 | 9 | 10.102 | 0.159 | 8 |
S6_39106643 | 8.308 | 0.135 | 27 | 8.467 | 0.136 | 28 | 11.112 | 0.202 | 1 |
Data collected manually in 2010 and published by Zhao et al. (2016).
The marker ranking is established based on P values for the corresponding chromosome.