Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 4.
Published in final edited form as: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2017 Mar 3;56(14):3951–3955. doi: 10.1002/anie.201612311

Table 1.

Optimization Studies

Entry[a] Ar–X Base Solvent Temp (°C) Yield (%)
2a 3a
1 PhI KOtBu PhMe 80 0 0
2 PhI KOtBu THF 60 0 0
3 PhI KOtBu MeCN 80 0 0
4[b] PhI KOtBu DMF 80 58 17
5 PhI KOtBu DMSO 80 70 11
6[c] PhI KOtBu DMSO 80 33 49
7[d] PhI KOtBu DMSO 80 63 18
8[e] PhI KOtBu DMSO 80 34 25
9[f] PhI KOtBu DMSO 80 0 39
10 PhI NaOtBu DMSO 80 0 trace
11 PhI KHMDS DMSO 80 0 trace
12 PhI LDA DMSO 80 0 12
13 PhBr KOtBu DMSO 80 64 15
14 PhCl KOtBu DMSO 80 52 11
15 PhF KOtBu DMSO 80 0 10
16 PhOTf KOtBu DMSO 80 0 21
[a]

Conditions: 2 equiv indole, 1 equiv aryl halide, 4 equiv KOtBu [0.3] M, all solvents were rigorously degassed by freeze/pump/thaw.

[b]

time = 24 h,

[c]

Conditions: 1 equiv indole, 3 equiv aryl halide, 4 equiv KOtBu, [0.3] M.

[d]

Reaction in the absence of light.

[e]

solvent not degassed, N2 atmosphere,

[f]

solvent saturated with O2, also O2 atmosphere.