Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 4.
Published in final edited form as: J Nurs Educ Pract. 2017 Feb 12;7(7):11–21. doi: 10.5430/jnep.v7n7P11

Table 4.

Themes with representative statements from interviews of faculty members who delivered the educational program.

Theme Representative statements
Program Had Value to Faculty Members and Students
  • You’ve got several different ways to do it, which I think was the strength of the study.

  • When we talked to the seniors, I think it was more eye opening for them because they were looking at situations that may not have been interpreted as more of an intimidation or bullying type scenario.

  • That may impact their confidence and ability to function. So, in that respect, this was very good because it kind of opened up that door for discussion and how do you handle this as a student.

Challenges to Continued Program Adoption
  • …having a better response from clinical faculty, but that’s difficult because a lot of times it’s adjunct…and they’re only here for a semester and then they’re gone.

  • …with most of them being adjunct…this wasn’t their priority.

Recommendations for Program Delivery
  • Now, I know the first clinical experience like is only a six-hour stint for the sophomores but maybe they could incorporate some sort of, um, role playing scenario in their lab sessions in Fundamentals I.

  • …maybe develop a—a—a booklet of some sorts with some case studies and they purchase it in the sophomore year and then they carry it all the way through and we use it, that’s the thing…