Table 2.
Number of powered electrode pairs | Relative flow rates (waste/collection channel) | Efficiencya [%] |
---|---|---|
One | 50 : 50 | 0 |
60 : 40 | 0 | |
65 : 35 | 0 | |
75 : 25 | 3.4 | |
78 : 22 | 41.5 | |
80 : 20 | 99.4 | |
85 : 15 | 100 | |
90 : 10 | 1.1 | |
Two | 11 : 89 | 0 |
20 : 80 | 17.2 | |
25 : 75 | 53.3 | |
30 : 70 | 90.7 | |
40 : 60 | 100 | |
50 : 50 | 100 | |
60 : 40 | 100 | |
70 : 30 | 100 | |
72 : 28 | 85.5 | |
75 : 25 | 0.6 | |
80 : 20 | 0 |
On average, more than 380 sorting events were analyzed for each data point shown in Fig. 1D.