Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 7;7(5):400–409. doi: 10.1177/2192568217699377

Table 2.

Porcine Spines: Change in Range of Motion (ROM) in Flexion-Extension (FE), Lateral Bending (LB), and Axial Rotation (AR), With Mean and SD Expressed as Percent (%).a

ROM (% Change) Posterior Concave Distraction Device vs Untreated Rigid PS vs Untreated Rigid PS vs Posterior Concave Distraction Device
Porcine Mean SD P Mean SD P Mean SD P
FE
 Proximal adjacent 2.1 7.4 1.000 1.0 6.3 1.000 1.0 2.8 1.000
 Bridged −55.9 7.1 <.001 −94.0 23.0 .001 −86.4 46.6 .018
 Distal adjacent 7.7 5.5 .056 8.3 7.1 .105 0.6 6.4 1.000
LB
 Proximal adjacent 4.7 6.9 .455 5.8 3.9 .045 1.1 6.8 1.000
 Bridged −17.9 7.7 .007 −92.2 26.2 .001 −90.4 28.0 .002
 Distal adjacent 4.1 4.8 .268 6.8 7.7 .244 2.8 6.4 .970
AR
 Proximal adjacent 0.7 10.4 1.000 9.4 22.1 1.000 10.0 14.6 .459
 Bridged 3.9 3.3 .104 −86.9 23.2 .001 −86.3 21.8 .001
 Distal adjacent 17.9 18.2 .183 23.9 15.4 .038 5.1 17.3 1.000

aData of the 3 bridged motion segments is averaged. Boldfaced values indicate statistical significance (P < .05). Rigid PS: bilateral rigid pedicle screw-rod instrumentation.