Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 4.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Neurosci. 2014 May 14;36(3-4):196–209. doi: 10.1159/000358918

Table 1.

Developmental neuroimaging studies

Author Year Task Sample Developmental differences

lPFC (Brodmann area 8, 9, 44, 45, 46) Striatum AIC AIC coordinates (MNI)

x y z
Response inhibition
Adleman [73] 2002 Stroop 7–22 Increase with age Increase with age Increase with age1
Andrews-Hanna [74] 2011 Stroop 14–25 Adults > adolescents n.s. Adults > adolescents −42 22 2
Booth [81] 2003 Go/no-go 9–11 Children > adults Children > adults n.s.
Bunge [75] 2002 Flanker 8–12 Adults > early adolescents Adults > early adolescents Adults > early adolescents (R) 34 17 −9
Early adolescents > adults (L) −42 27 4
Go/no-go Adults > early adolescents n.s. n.s.
Casey [82] 1997 Go/no-go 7–12 Early adolescents > adults n.s. n.s.

Casey [117] 2002 Stimulus-response compatibility 7–11 n.s. Adolescents > adults n.s.
Cohen [113] 2010 Stop signal task 9–19 n.s. n.s. n.s.
Luna [83] 2001 Antisaccade 8–30 Adolescents > adults n.s. n.s.
Marsh [76] 2006 Stroop 7–57 Increase with age Increase with age Decrease with age −36 13 1
Rubia [77] 2000 Stop task 12–19 Adults > adolescents Adolescents > adults Adults > adolescents (L) −40 6 5
Adolescents > adults (R) 38 22 6
Rubia [79] 2006 Simon task 10–17 Adults > adolescents Adults > adolescents Adults > adolescents 32 19 11
Switch task Adults > adolescents Adults > adolescents Adults > adolescents −32 7 −2
Go/no-go Adults > adolescents Adults > adolescents n.s.

Rubia [85] 2007 Stop task 10–17 n.s. Increase with age Increase with age 43 27 2
Rubia [78] 2013 Stop task 13–19 Increase with age Increase with age n.s.
Decrease with age
Tamm [84] 2002 Go/no-go 8–20 Decrease with age n.s. Increase with age −34 12 6
Velanova [80] 2009 Antisaccade 8–27 Increase with age n.s. n.s.

Reward processing
Bjork [92] 2004 Monetary incentive delay 12–17 n.s. Adults > adolescents n.s.
Bjork [93] 2010 Monetary incentive delay 12–17 n.s. Adults > adolescents n.s.
Christakou [118] 2013 Gambling task 12–18 Increase with age n.s. n.s.
Galvan [90] 2006 Pirate task 13–17 n.a. Adolescents > adults n.a.
Galvan [98] 2013 Primary reward 13–17 Adolescents > adults Adolescents > adults Adolescents > adults 34 26 8
Geier [94] 2010 Reward antisaccade 13–17 n.s. Adolescents > adults n.s.

Hoogendam [114] 2013 Monetary incentive delay 10–25 n.s. Decrease with age n.s.
Jarcho [99] 2012 Guessing task 14 n.s. Adolescents > adults Adolescents > adults 34 8 −3
Krain [95] 2006 Card guessing task 13–17 n.s. n.s. n.s.
Padmanabhan [96] 2011 Reward antisaccade 14–17 n.a. Adolescents > adults n.a.
Teslovich [115] 2013 Rewarded random dot 13–21 Adolescents > adults n.s. n.s.
Van Leijenhorst [97] 2010 Slot machine 14–15 n.s. Adolescents > adults Adolescents > adults 42 12 −3

Risky decision making
Bjork [102] 2007 Chicken game 12–17 n.s. n.s. n.s.
Chein [103] 2011 Stoplight 14–18 Adults > adolescents Adolescents > adults2 n.s.
Paulsen [105] 2012 Domino game 14–16 Increase with age Increase with age Increase with age 36 16 −6
Eshel [104] 2007 Wheel of fortune 9–17 n.s. n.s. Adults > adolescents −44 14 −6
Van Leijenhorst [116] 2006 Cake task 9–12 n.s. n.s. n.s.
Barkley-Levenson [101] 2013 Gambling task 13–17 n.s. n.s. n.s.

n.s.= A whole-brain analysis was reported but no peak activations for the ROI were reported. n.a.= no whole-brain analyses were reported and therefore we were unable to assess activation in this region.

1

The specific peak coordinates of this activation are unavailable due to the large cluster size included in this activation map (6,109 voxels).

2

Ventral striatum activation in Chein et al. [103] (2011) was only significant when social context was manipulated.