Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 22;60(6 Suppl):1695–1711. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-S-16-0234

Table 3.

ANOVA results for syllable duration.

Effect df Adjusted sum of squares ηp 2 F
Delay 1 5.79 0.19 18.12*
Order 2 10.87 0.30 21.79**
Participant 7 3.65 0.13 0.93
Syllable 5 18.79 0.42 88.60**
Delay × Order 2 0.78 0.03 7.68*
Delay × Participant 7 2.30 0.08 5.24*
Delay × Syllable 5 0.47 0.02 6.68**
Order × Participant 14 3.60 0.12 4.74*
Order × Syllable 10 0.14 0.01 2.70*
Participant × Syllable 35 1.53 0.06 2.69*
Delay × Order × Participant 14 0.73 0.03 14.95**
Delay × Order × Syllable 10 0.08 0.00 2.25*
Delay × Participant × Syllable 35 0.51 0.02 4.16**
Order × Participant × Syllable 70 0.37 0.01 1.52*
Delay × Order × Participant × Syllable 70 0.25 0.01 2.74**
Total 19,772

Note. Durations of nonerror syllables were analyzed by using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) with main factors of delay (0 or 200 ms), syllable (/bi/, /bu/, /da/, /du/, /za/, /zi/), syllable order in the stimulus sequence (one to three), and Participants 1–8 (random factor), with all possible interactions. Shown are the degrees of freedom, adjusted sum of squares error, partial eta-squared value, and F value for each effect.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .001.