Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Heart Fail. 2017 Mar 21;19(8):1043–1052. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.789

Table 6.

Mechanical Dyssynchrony as assessed by SD T2P LS and the association with outcome in patients with and without atrial fibrillation

N Events Hazard Ratio (95% CI) P-value
In patients with sinus rhythm
SD T2P LS obtained from the 4CH view per 10 ms increase
Unadjusted 247 60 1.04 (0.99–1.08) 0.096
Model 1 247 60 1.02 (0.98–1.07) 0.273
Model 2 239 58 1.03 (0.98–1.08) 0.275
In patients with atrial fibrillation
SD T2P LS obtained from the 4CH view per 10 ms increase
Unadjusted 176 47 1.04 (0.99–1.08) 0.098
Model 1 176 47 1.03 (1.00–1.08) 0.129
Model 2 171 47 1.02 (0.96–1.07) 0.526
Interaction between SD T2P LS and atrial fibrillation
Unadjusted 0.940
In fully adjusted model (Model 2) 0.154

Model 1 is adjusted for age, sex, race, randomization strata (previous HF hospitalization or biomarker criteria), randomized treatment. Model 2 includes the same variables as Model 1 + core laboratory left ventricular LVEF, heart rate, New York Heart Association class, history of stroke, creatinine, hematocrit and QRS duration.