Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 20;5(7):e94. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.7088

Table 5.

Characteristics of interventions and rates of adherence: randomized controlled trials with pre and post outcomes and control group.

First author and year Length of study Adherence measure and rate Dropout rate (%) Type of social presence Frequency of social presence Service user involvement in development Measure of participant feedback and rating of acceptability
Palmier-Claus 2013 (also reported in Ainsworth et al, 2013) [29,30] 4x a day for 6 days % of participants completing the intervention: 88, (across all participants) 1 asked to have SMSastopped 2 days early due to rumination (4.1%) Once or twice per week based on participants preference Once or twice per week based on participants preference Participants were interviewed about their experience Qualitative interviews with range of perspectives on usability, all participants completed the feedback assessments
Van der Krieke 2013 [31] 6 weeks, self-directed use of website % of participants completing the intervention: 71% used full functionality of the website 40(55%) Assist was available to answer questions over the phone anytime 3 days a week Open interviews with 15 patients to evaluate the intervention 30 used the Web program
Kurtz 2015 [32] COG REMbtreatment: 50 min/day 3 days/week for 23 weeks


SSTc: 50 min/day, two days/week, for 23 weeks


Computer skills:
Target 50 hours over 23 weeks
% of participants completing the intervention: 100%, (min criteria for inclusion; all individuals received at least one session) 8(14.28%) Interaction with clinician for both COG REM and computer Skills training groups


SST group: 2x per week for 50 min, led by researchers
Not applicable Not applicable SST Mean number of sessions=32.3


COG REM Mean number of sessions=31.9


Computer skills=Mean number of sessions=32.2

Smith 2015 [33] Up to 10 hours of virtual interviews over the course of 5 visits Mean % of entries completed: 90% of sessions attended and completed 2(6%) Basic contact during computer intervention During intervention only briefly None reported 90% attendance rates of sessions
Beebe 2014
[34]
3 months Mean % of entries completed: 81.60 (across all participants) 2(6.6%) Various: weekly telephone calls, daily text messages, both Various None reported Phone calls plus text message group higher adherence by a mean of 5.3%
Mortiz 2016 [35] 3 months % of participants completing the intervention; 28% used it once a week 9(15%) None- unguided None None reported Feedback on use of the program, 72% rated the quality of the program as good to excellent

aSMS: short message service.

bCOG REM: cognitive remediation.

cSST: social skills training.