Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 4;16:139. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0640-9

Table 5.

Internal Migrants’ Social Integration in 2014

Variables Definition Options % or x ± s
Monthly household income Income of all family members in the current residence 3500-7000a
Income, occupation position, and degree of respect compared with relatives, friends and colleagues at current residence Subjective social status and level of respect compared to other people, measured by marking a “social ladder” (1 as the bottom status to 10 as the top status) 5.47 ± 1.60
5.98 ± 1.60
Old-age insurance Own either township workers’ old-age insurance, urban residents’ old-age insurance, or new rural social pension insurance no 27.7
yes 72.3
Medical insurance Own either social medical insurance or commercial medical insurance no 14.8
yes 85.2
Number of organizations participated in (0–8) Number of organizations respondents participated in, including labor union, volunteer associations, the Chinese Communist Party group of migrants/local residents, alumni association, chamber of commerce of hometown, fellow-townsman associations, and other organizations 0.40 ± 0.77
Number of activities attended (0–7) Number of activities respondents attended, for example, community sports, social public welfare activities, election campaigns, awards events, the home owners’ committee, management activities of residents’ committees, and other activities 0.66 ± 1.04
Type of neighbors Whether neighbors of respondents were registered residents, whohad “Hukou”, or migrants Outsiders 43.5
The locals 20.6
Outsiders and locals 29.5
Not sure 6.4
Consent of the views (8–40) Those views include 7 problems about social norms or customs:
1) The customs of the hometown (such as the customs of marriage, funerals) is more important to you;
2) Working in the current place is more important to you than living in the hometown;
3) Your child should learn to speak the hometown dialect;
4) Maintaining the hometown’s lifestyle, such as eating habits, is important;
5) There is a big difference in health habits between you and local residents;
6) There is a big discrepancy in clothing, education, or retirement style between you and local residents;
7) Your opinions of some social issues are very distinct from the local residents’.
Respondents provided their agreement with these views based on a five-point scale (strongly agree, agree, neither agree or not, disagree, strongly disagree).
23.80 ± 4.09
Familiarity with local dialect Proficiency in the local language Don’t understand 14.9
Understand some only 23.0
Understand and speak some 22.7
Understand and speak 39.4
Integration will (9–36) Consists of 9 questions, such as, “I would like to live together with locals in a block (community)”, “I would like to be a colleague with locals”, and “I would like to be a neighbor with locals”. Respondents answered based on a four-point scale (1 = disagree completely to 4 = agree completely), with the higher score meaning better integration will. 30.43 ± 4.28
Discrimination perception (4–16) Includes 4 questions: “I feel the locals are willing to accept me as a part of them,” “I feel the locals don’t want to be my neighbors,” “I feel the locals don’t like me,” and “I feel the locals look down on me” (1 = disagree completely to 4 = agree completely), with higher score meaning more discrimination perception. 7.34 ± 2.16
Willingness to bring family members to local residence Whether to bring the subject’s spouse, unmarried children, or parents to local residence in the next 1 to 3 years All of family members at location 26.6
Yes 23.6
Yes, but only some 14.1
No 30.7
Not sure 4.9

Note: a interquartile