Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 9.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Nutr Metab. 2017 Jun 9;70(4):312–320. doi: 10.1159/000475766

Table 4.

Effects of the WL and AEX+WL interventions stratified by glucose tolerance status

WL AEX+WL Intervention *Group Intervention Group
NGT (N=15) IGT (N=13) NGT (N=20) IGT (N=12)
ΔBody weight (kg) −6.5 ± 0.7    −7.7 ± 0.9 −7.2 ± 0.7  −7.4 ± 1.4 NS NS NS
BMI (kg/m2) −2.4 ± 0.3    −2.9 ± 0.3 −2.7 ± 0.2  −2.7 ± 0.5 NS NS NS
ΔWaist circumference (cm) −5.9 ± 1.6    −5.9 ± 1.4 −4.4 ± 1.1  −4.4 ± 1.7 NS NS NS
ΔHip circumference (cm) −5.7 ± 0.9    −4.6 ± 1.5 −5.2 ± 1.3  −7.0 ± 1.4 NS NS NS
ΔWHR −0.01 ± 0.01   −0.01 ± 0.01 0.01 ± 0.01   0.00 ± 0.02 NS NS NS
ΔBody fat (%) −2.1 ± 0.4    −3.0 ± 0.6 −4.6 ± 0.7  −3.1 ± 1.1 NS NS NS
ΔTotal body fat mass (kg) −4.9 ± 0.6    −6.5 ± 0.7 −6.4 ± 0.7  −5.8 ± 1.5 NS NS NS
ΔTotal body fat-free mass (kg) −1.6 ± 0.5    −2.4 ± 1.0 −0.6 ± 0.3   −1.0 ± 1.0   NS <0.05 NS
ΔAndroid fat mass (kg) −0.42 ± 0.10    −0.65 ± 0.10 −0.61 ± 0.07 −0.55 ± 0.14 NS NS NS
ΔGynoid fat mass (kg) −0.97 ± 0.16    −1.10 ± 0.13 −1.29 ± 0.17 −1.03 ± 0.21 NS NS NS
ΔAndroid/gynoid fat mass 0.002 ± 0.010 −0.007 ± 0.009 −0.020 ± 0.006 −0.014 ± 0.010   NS <0.05 NS
ΔVisceral abdominal fat area (cm2) −20.3 ± 11.9   −23.5 ± 8.1 −20.3 ± 5.9   −25.6 ± 15.5   NS NS NS
ΔSubcutaneous abdominal fat area (cm2) 16.6 ± 51.1 −61.70 ± 29.0   −77.2 ± 15.1 −68.4 ± 18.5 NS NS NS
ΔVisceral/subcutaneous abdominal fat area −0.09 0.09     0.05 0.07    −0.01 0.02 −0.03 0.02 NS NS NS
ΔAbsolute VO2max (L/min) −0.10 ± 0.06   −0.03 ± 0.04   0.21 ± 0.04   0.19 ± 0.06 NS <0.01 NS

Significant change from baseline:

P<0.05,

P<0.01.

Intervention represents WL vs. AEX+WL; Group represents NGT vs. IGT.